Once a contract has been formed, its terms set out the rights and obligations of each party. These terms define what has been agreed, determine when a breach occurs, and guide what remedies are available. Terms may be express (clearly stated) or implied (inserted by law or custom), and their importance determines the consequences of breach.
Express terms are those specifically agreed by the parties, either verbally or in writing. They can be contained in a signed document, oral discussion, or pre-contract statements.
Incorporation of terms:
Terms must be properly brought to the other party’s attention before or at the time of contracting.
Key methods of incorporation:
By signature: Signing a document usually binds a party to its terms, even if unread (L’Estrange v Graucob [1934]).
By notice: Reasonable steps must be taken to make terms known (Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877]).
Terms must be available before or at the time of contracting (Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel [1949]).
By course of dealing: Terms may be implied from consistent past dealings (Spurling v Bradshaw [1956]).
Collateral contracts: A separate, binding promise made alongside the main contract (Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951]).
Implied terms are not expressly agreed but are inserted by law, custom, or the nature of the contract to make it workable or fair.
(a) Terms implied in fact – inserted to reflect the parties’ unspoken intentions.
The Moorcock [1889] – Terms implied for “business efficacy.”
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] – The “officious bystander” test: the term is so obvious that “it goes without saying.”
(b) Terms implied by law – inserted automatically for certain types of contract (e.g. employment, sale of goods).
Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] – Landlord’s duty implied in law.
(c) Terms implied by custom or trade usage – common industry practices recognised by the courts (Hutton v Warren [1836]).
(d) Statutory implied terms:
Sale of Goods Act 1979: goods must be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose.
Consumer Rights Act 2015: applies to consumer contracts; ensures fairness and quality standards.
The seriousness of a breach depends on the type of term broken.
Condition: A major term going to the root of the contract. Breach allows termination and damages (Poussard v Spiers [1876]).
Warranty: A minor term. Breach allows damages only, not termination (Bettini v Gye [1876]).
Innominate term: Intermediate importance. The remedy depends on the seriousness of the breach (Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki [1962]).
Not every statement made before a contract is a term.
A term is a binding promise forming part of the contract.
A representation is a pre-contract statement inducing entry into the contract but not itself binding.
If a representation is false, it may give rise to misrepresentation, not breach of contract (Oscar Chess v Williams [1957]).
Parties sometimes include clauses limiting or excluding liability for breach. These are subject to strict controls.
Common law controls:
Clauses must be clearly incorporated and unambiguous (Hollier v Rambler Motors [1972]).
Statutory controls:
Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) – restricts exclusion of negligence or breach of implied terms in business contracts.
Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA) – bans unfair terms in consumer contracts.