Nuisance protects a person’s use and enjoyment of land and the wider public’s right to reasonable comfort and convenience. It addresses ongoing, unreasonable interferences rather than one-off events. There are two main types: private nuisance (affecting individuals) and public nuisance (affecting the community).
Definition:
An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or with rights over it, caused by the unreasonable actions of another.
Key case: Sturges v Bridgman [1879] – a doctor’s consulting room was disturbed by noise from a nearby confectioner’s machinery. What is reasonable depends on the character of the area.
(a) Who Can Sue?
Only those with an interest in land (owner, tenant) may claim (Hunter v Canary Wharf [1997]).
(b) Who Can Be Liable?
The creator of the nuisance.
The occupier or owner who allows it to continue (Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940]).
Sometimes landlords if they authorised it.
(c) What Amounts to Unreasonable Interference?
The court balances competing interests. Factors include:
Nature of the area – residential vs industrial (Sturges v Bridgman).
Duration and timing – regular or night-time activity (Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks [1996]).
Sensitivity of the claimant – abnormal sensitivity not protected (Robinson v Kilvert [1889]).
Malice or motive – deliberate interference is unreasonable (Christie v Davey [1893]).
Public benefit – may reduce but not eliminate liability (Miller v Jackson [1977]).
(d) Indirect Interference Examples
Noise, smells, vibrations, smoke, or overhanging branches.
(e) Defences
Prescription – 20 years of uninterrupted nuisance may legalise it (Sturges v Bridgman).
Statutory authority – if activity authorised by Parliament (Allen v Gulf Oil Refining [1981]).
Contributory negligence or consent in limited cases.
Note: “Coming to the nuisance” (moving to the area later) is not a defence.
(f) Remedies
Injunction – to stop or limit the nuisance.
Damages – for loss of enjoyment or property damage.
Abatement – self-help removal (e.g. cutting overhanging branches).
Definition:
An act or omission that materially affects the comfort, convenience, or health of the public or a significant section of it.
Key case: Attorney-General v PYA Quarries [1957] – dust and noise from quarrying affected many homes; defined as “something so widespread that it would be unreasonable to expect one person to bring an action.”
(a) Who Can Sue?
The Attorney General on behalf of the public.
An individual who suffers special damage beyond that suffered by the general public (Castle v St Augustine’s Links [1922] – motorist injured by golf balls could sue).
(b) Examples:
Obstructing a highway (R v Wheeler [1778]).
Pollution of public rivers (R v Stephens [1866]).
Loud noise, smoke, or disease affecting a neighbourhood.
(c) Defences:
Statutory authority.
Reasonable use if authorised by legislation.
(d) Remedies:
Injunctions (often sought by local authorities or the Attorney General).
Damages for individuals who suffer particular loss.